ThOUGHT ABOUT MY "NEW" P64 SOME...
Posted: April 22nd, 2016, 10:16 am
I took my “new” P-64 out on the range on Wednesday, and despite its rough edges I think it’s an awesome little gun. A regular little tack driver when I took the time to really work those puny sights, and more than enough combat accuracy when I thought of it like a snubby and just used a point and shoot technique.
When it comes to concealed carry, I won’t carry anything large like a Glock 17 or a full-sized 1911. Even a Glock 19 is too big for me. I’m a big guy, but I don’t like big guns. I like to travel light, and my carry preference is something sized like a Walther PPK/S, Makarov, or BT380, along with two spare mags. So, the P-64 is a perfect carry size. When it comes to caliber feuds, I just get bored. I’m good to go with anything that is .22wmr or bigger. When it comes to carry guns that I will actually carry (Walther PPK/S sized guns or snubbies), I figure that 9x17, 9x18, 9x19, and .38spcl are all gonna pack a more or less equal punch – so, once again, the P-64 gives me what I need. Mostly…
My P-64 came with only one spare mag, and I had a heck of a time finding any spare mags on the internet. 21 years of standing Navy Quarterdeck watches makes me uncomfortable with carrying less than two spare mags, so this had to be remedied. I searched a bit, but I could only find one – J&G Sales had a used mag with a chipped pinky extension. I ordered it. The mag works fine, so I took a hack saw and some sandpaper and smoothed-down/rounded-off the base plate. No finger rest, but it is extended. It’s kind of ugly but works just fine, so it now rides in my spare mage pouch.
I fired 100 rounds on Wednesday, it’s now Friday, and I still have a nasty slide-bite mark and it stings. I attribute this to the humungusly heavy trigger pull, lack of beaver tail, and undersized grips. The gun is pretty danged accurate, which I attribute to the blow-back action and overall quality of design, so I'm more than willing to look beyond its shortcomings and recognize its potential as a viable concealed carry weapon. You might be able to get a cheesy ethnic Polish joke about how many Po-locks it takes to pull a P-64 trigger, but there is no joke to be made about the design itself. Then, again, it is essentially a Walther PPK so its bound to be good. And it is. It’s a very good design – but it can be improved.
The great design, thin and compact size, rugged and simple build, boring reliability, and outstanding accuracy make it worth the modifications I plan to put into it. I’ve ordered a pair or Marshal’s grips for it – standard length, checkered, black stained Zebra wood, with the extended beaver tail… should be a really sharp looking weapon when those arrive. I’m gonna put a dab of bright orange nail polish on the front sight to improve the sight picture and squeeze even more accuracy out of it. And, finally, I’m gonna put some Wolf Springs into it.
And this is where I have a few questions for the seasoned P-64 owners out there. What weight hammer spring do you recommend? Is the 17 pound spring prone to light primer strikes? Does the 18 pound spring provide any advantage over the 17 pound spring? Finally, if I change the hammer spring does it do any good to go with a corresponding weight on the recoil spring? Or will the original recoil spring work just fine with the lighter after-market hammer spring?
In today’s concealed carry age, and with .380ACP no longer being viewed in a negative light by many gun owners, I have to wonder how well a modified P-64 would sell. The original design may have been less than ideal when it came to being a military/law enforcement duty pistol, but it’s a fine personal defense/concealed carry weapon. So, take the same basic design and do some modifications for mainstream civilian carry: chamber it for 9x17, give it a decent trigger pull and beaver tail along the lines of the S&W-Walther PPK/s or BT380, perhaps modify the firing pin set-up so that it doesn’t run the risk of a slam fire, improve the sights so they’re on par with a PPK/S or a BT380, give it a pair of rubber grips or state of the art polymer grips and make them a wrap-around style like a PPK (not PPK/S) or a PM Makarov, perhaps make the frame out of aluminum to save weight, and price it the $350-$400 range. Call it something like P-64CC (concealed carry), and I bet it would sell really well. I’d buy one, anyway.
When it comes to concealed carry, I won’t carry anything large like a Glock 17 or a full-sized 1911. Even a Glock 19 is too big for me. I’m a big guy, but I don’t like big guns. I like to travel light, and my carry preference is something sized like a Walther PPK/S, Makarov, or BT380, along with two spare mags. So, the P-64 is a perfect carry size. When it comes to caliber feuds, I just get bored. I’m good to go with anything that is .22wmr or bigger. When it comes to carry guns that I will actually carry (Walther PPK/S sized guns or snubbies), I figure that 9x17, 9x18, 9x19, and .38spcl are all gonna pack a more or less equal punch – so, once again, the P-64 gives me what I need. Mostly…
My P-64 came with only one spare mag, and I had a heck of a time finding any spare mags on the internet. 21 years of standing Navy Quarterdeck watches makes me uncomfortable with carrying less than two spare mags, so this had to be remedied. I searched a bit, but I could only find one – J&G Sales had a used mag with a chipped pinky extension. I ordered it. The mag works fine, so I took a hack saw and some sandpaper and smoothed-down/rounded-off the base plate. No finger rest, but it is extended. It’s kind of ugly but works just fine, so it now rides in my spare mage pouch.
I fired 100 rounds on Wednesday, it’s now Friday, and I still have a nasty slide-bite mark and it stings. I attribute this to the humungusly heavy trigger pull, lack of beaver tail, and undersized grips. The gun is pretty danged accurate, which I attribute to the blow-back action and overall quality of design, so I'm more than willing to look beyond its shortcomings and recognize its potential as a viable concealed carry weapon. You might be able to get a cheesy ethnic Polish joke about how many Po-locks it takes to pull a P-64 trigger, but there is no joke to be made about the design itself. Then, again, it is essentially a Walther PPK so its bound to be good. And it is. It’s a very good design – but it can be improved.
The great design, thin and compact size, rugged and simple build, boring reliability, and outstanding accuracy make it worth the modifications I plan to put into it. I’ve ordered a pair or Marshal’s grips for it – standard length, checkered, black stained Zebra wood, with the extended beaver tail… should be a really sharp looking weapon when those arrive. I’m gonna put a dab of bright orange nail polish on the front sight to improve the sight picture and squeeze even more accuracy out of it. And, finally, I’m gonna put some Wolf Springs into it.
And this is where I have a few questions for the seasoned P-64 owners out there. What weight hammer spring do you recommend? Is the 17 pound spring prone to light primer strikes? Does the 18 pound spring provide any advantage over the 17 pound spring? Finally, if I change the hammer spring does it do any good to go with a corresponding weight on the recoil spring? Or will the original recoil spring work just fine with the lighter after-market hammer spring?
In today’s concealed carry age, and with .380ACP no longer being viewed in a negative light by many gun owners, I have to wonder how well a modified P-64 would sell. The original design may have been less than ideal when it came to being a military/law enforcement duty pistol, but it’s a fine personal defense/concealed carry weapon. So, take the same basic design and do some modifications for mainstream civilian carry: chamber it for 9x17, give it a decent trigger pull and beaver tail along the lines of the S&W-Walther PPK/s or BT380, perhaps modify the firing pin set-up so that it doesn’t run the risk of a slam fire, improve the sights so they’re on par with a PPK/S or a BT380, give it a pair of rubber grips or state of the art polymer grips and make them a wrap-around style like a PPK (not PPK/S) or a PM Makarov, perhaps make the frame out of aluminum to save weight, and price it the $350-$400 range. Call it something like P-64CC (concealed carry), and I bet it would sell really well. I’d buy one, anyway.