The Unofficial P64 Resource Forum

kurremkarm wrote:http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/edu113.htm

Thanks for posting that link.

I have to agree with everything that man said.

re:"And the stiff double action trigger pull would act as a great “Safety” if carried with the hammer down and the Safety engaged. The shooter sure isn’t going to “accidentally” pull that double action trigger. "

My sentiments exactly...

MakAttack wrote:re:"And the stiff double action trigger pull would act as a great “Safety” if carried with the hammer down and the Safety engaged. The shooter sure isn’t going to “accidentally” pull that double action trigger. "

My sentiments exactly...

Engaging the safety really wouldn't be necessary with the stiff DA trigger.

Its harder to pull the trigger on one of these than on one of my revolvers and they have no safety.

torpeau wrote:

MakAttack wrote:re:"And the stiff double action trigger pull would act as a great “Safety” if carried with the hammer down and the Safety engaged. The shooter sure isn’t going to “accidentally” pull that double action trigger. "

My sentiments exactly...

Engaging the safety really wouldn't be necessary with the stiff DA trigger.

I agree. I think that (the way it was written) the author meant "carried with the hammer down and the Safety [DIS]engaged." But I too agreed with everything he said...except maybe the recoil, but then again I have big hands and don't really mind it with stock springs.

Ross

I didn't learn anything new from this guy. No new info was presented that has not been expressed on here at some point in time.

True but it is advertisement for the gun.